Re: gnotes+ editor strangeness

[Andy Kahn <kahn zk3 dec com>]

On Thu, Mar 18, 1999 at 12:20:26PM -0800, Fox, Kevin M wrote:
> 
> "gnp &" for forking and "gnp" for not...

ehh... in both cases, something is forking, else you wouldn't have a
process in the first place.


> It is not a big issue but it makes gnp a non standard app. (is there a
> reason that it should break tradition?)

not sure what tradition you're referring to, but it's basically done
this way because i personally find it more convenient (e.g., i don't
have the need to run it from the script, so by doing this, i don't
have to always add a '&').
--andy