RE: Updated gnome-* RPMs

["Fox, Kevin M" <KMFox mail bhi-erc com>]

There is only one way to find out :)

you can allways force a downgrade if it has problems

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Hall Stevenson [SMTP:dhs@erinet.com]
> Sent:	Friday, March 19, 1999 8:40 AM
> To:	Fox, Kevin M; gnome-list@gnome.org
> Subject:	Re: Updated gnome-* RPMs
> 
> Correct, it does have the updated glibc package(s). I have no problem
> using
> them, unless there will be other "problems" with it. ;-)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fox, Kevin M <KMFox@mail.bhi-erc.com>
> To: 'Hall Stevenson' <dhs@erinet.com>; gnome-list@gnome.org
> <gnome-list@gnome.org>
> Date: Friday, March 19, 1999 11:35 AM
> Subject: RE: Updated gnome-* RPMs
> 
> 
> >Starbuck uses 2.1, you should be able to find a 2.1 rpm in the starbuck
> rpm
> >directory...
> >
> >As to breaking anything, I dont know....
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Hall Stevenson [SMTP:dhs@erinet.com]
> >> Sent: Friday, March 19, 1999 8:28 AM
> >> To: gnome-list@gnome.org
> >> Subject: Re: Updated gnome-* RPMs
> 
> 
> <snip>
> >> Now when trying to upgrade them, they complain about GLIBC2.1 !!!
> >>
> >> I got them from a RedHat "starbuck" mirror... Is that the problem? Do
> the
> >> RPMs at the gnome mirrors require the newer glibc libraries ? If so, I
> >> have
> >> no problem updating my glibc packages, so long as it breaks nothing
> else.
> 
> 
> <snip>