Re: why devel gtk+?
- From: Sri Ramkrishna <sri aracnet com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <rhp zirx pair com>
- cc: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: why devel gtk+?
- Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 13:31:54 -0800 (PST)
> They aren't, the 1.2.1 series is stable and binary compatible, as is the
> Gnome 1.0 series. Things work fine with 1.2.0, you just can't change your
> accelerator keys because of some glitch in 1.2.0. If you don't want to
> change your accelerator keys, then there's no reason to upgrade.
It's more so that I can get rid of teh annoying messages I see. Nothing
more.:)
> There are no plans to start on an incompatible gnome-libs in the near
> future. We are writing applications and stabilizing the desktop stuff
> instead.
Thats all I wanted to know. I was concerned that we were going to keep on
following the developement gtk releases when we are trying to stabilize
gnome-libs/gnome-core. I would hate for GNOME to be unstable because we
were using the development branch of the GTK toolkit.
sri
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sri Ramkrishna /|\ Unix is very user friendly, its just very picky
email: sri@aracnet.com -|- on who it is friendly to. -- Unknown?
phone: 503-356-1078 \|/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]