Re: Writing free documentation/GNOME books
- From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel nuclecu unam mx>
- To: "David C. Mason" <dcm redhat com>
- Cc: gnome-list gnome org, gnome-hackers gnome org, free-docs-publishing nuclecu unam mx
- Subject: Re: Writing free documentation/GNOME books
- Date: 26 May 1999 08:18:09 -0500
> I truly hope you don't think the User documentation is lacking as that
> would be a real ego deflater for me. The project has grown good feet
> and now there are many people working on it from a writing, editing,
> and translation standpoint.
Please read my message again.
I am sad and upset about the publishing industry and how it treats
consumers and authors of books. And I want to get OpenSourced books
to people and get authors a better deal when they publish their
books.
> If there are any problems with it, it is
> my lack of getting more GNOME hackers to give it a technical review (I
> don't get the feeling too many of the major project contributors have
> read it yet).
what is this documentation you are talking about? The one that Dave
at Red Hat wrote? I am missing something here.
Fact is: the GNOME API documentation is not yet finished, it lacks
examples, and some introductory material.
> The GTK documentation has gotten off to a great start and is being
> maintained very well. I personally think it is important to get GTK
> done before GNOME, but that is a personal opinion.
They can be done in parallel.
> I think it is important that these projects have one or two
> maintainers at the maximum so that it remains well organized. I am the
> sole maintainer of the User docs and would be happy to join in and
> share the duties of maintaining the GNOME API project. GTK is being
> handled well so we should let it grow and start contributing more.
I would love to get your help on this task.
> As to starting a company, I will try to keep my opinions to myself as
> much as possible here. I personally don't think it is a good step for
> the GNOME project.
I am not saying the GNOME project should do it. I even suggested the
FSF could be a good starting place. I have received a number of
comments from people that have companies that are trying to do this.
I do not care who publishes them, I just want:
1. Open Sourced documentation.
2. A good pay for the authors.
3. A company that is willing to publish those books.
Best wishes,
Miguel.
--
miguel@gnu.org
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]