RE: Simple configuration question...
- From: bob cs csoft net
- To: Gregory Leblanc <GLeblanc cu-portland edu>
- cc: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: RE: Simple configuration question...
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 17:42:51 -0600 (CST)
On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: bob@cs.csoft.net [mailto:bob@cs.csoft.net]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 1999 3:25 PM
> > To: Gregory Leblanc
> > Cc: 'Marcelo J. Iturbe'; gnome-list@gnome.org
> > Subject: RE: Simple configuration question...
> >
> > > This is not a GNOME issue, but an X Window System issue. You
> > > should look at your /etc/X11/XF86Config file, and find the
> > > POINTER
> > section.
> > > It should list your pointer there, and I tend to find that
> > > "imps/2" works, but you could also try a more generic "PS/2".
> > > I'm sorry you had to choose RedHat 6.1, they did not bother to do
> > > any quality
> >
> >
> > WHAT?!? Please dont make such dumbass comments here. (I know
> > I am having
> > to make one now, but it has to be said). I find that rh6.1 has
> > great quality.
>
> O.K., perhaps I was a little harsh. However, I've discovered three
> distinct bugs in the text mode setup, and probably a dozen things
Give them a break. they just created the graphical setup trying to make
it easier on everyone and first releases often have a fiew bugs. (just
check out gnome 1.0 :)
> that they've mucked with in RPMs and dependancies. I.E. You can't
> installed gnome-core without also installing enlightenment. I found
Thats allways been the case. 6.0 had the same problem.
> redhat 6.0 to be generally less quirky than 6.1, and certainly easier
> to install. They also removed some of the functionality from their
6.1 installed perfictly for me the first time.
> expert mode install, as well as from their text mode install.
Hmm. I dont know. Maybe. It is posible that there was a problem with it
that they had to remove. Ask the redhat people to see why it was removed
and if they could add it back.
> Greg
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.1 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
>
> iQA/AwUBODx1LpLW/u8jW+lnEQJZxQCgkwDircC3Fu/qngvj/m341cHubDsAn1Ia
> 1NMZL9a3rxFyLYND+AxHrJz5
> =NY00
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]