RE: C++ gnome code vs. gcc-2.95.1

[Marcin Gorycki <mgo olicom dk>]

> It is glib that is defining NULL.  Doing a cvs log on glib.h, 
> we see that
> the problem is fixed in the HEAD branch (revision 1.140):
> 
> Maybe this patch should be merged in from the head branch.

ok, so this (kind of) solves the NULL thing. I will replace NULLs with 0s
anyway, just to be sure. What about _() returning void* ? Anybody know
what's going on there ? I don's know a thing about how it works, or even
where exactly it is located :(

marcin