Re: C++ gnome code vs. gcc-2.95.1

From: Federico Mena Quintero <federico redhat com>
To: hp redhat com
CC: gnome-list gnome org
Subject: Re: C++ gnome code vs. gcc-2.95.1
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 12:14:02 -0400

>  I don't think 0 is correct in C; that is the problem. Using 0 for the NULL
>  pointer may cause "implicit conversion from integer to pointer" warnings.

0 is a perfectly valid pointer value in C.  It is correct to use it
anywhere but vararg lists.

  Federico

References:
- RE: C++ gnome code vs. gcc-2.95.1
  - From: Havoc Pennington

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]