Re: [Specifying idl path.]
- From: Anthony Richardella <zorc3 netscape net>
- To: gnome list <gnome-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Specifying idl path.]
- Date: 12 Apr 00 20:17:08 PDT
Having thought about this a little more, using $GNOME_PATH shouldn't be
necessary for compiling things. Is there a analogy for $CFLAGS that can be
used for passing arguments to the orbit-idl program? Are there any conventions
for setting paths to idl files?
Also why doesn't orbit-idl exit with an error code when it encounters an
error? It prints an error message but make keeps on going afterward.
>Anthony Richardella <zorc3@netscape.net> wrote:
>While compiling Nautilus I ran into this problem. I've kept my base gnome
>libraries in /usr and installed the libraries necessary to get Nautilus
>running in $prefix_something_else to keep them separate. I added the new
>directory to my GNOME_PATH. This worked until Nautilus went to compile >one
of
>it's idl files which depended on a idl in Bonobo. The make script got the
>idl
>path from
>
>gnome-config --cpath idl
>
>which returned -I/usr/share/idl. Therefore it couldn't find the Bonobo >idl.
If
>the GNOME_PATH was searched though, then it should be able to find it. I
>don't
>know much about how autogen.sh creates the Makefiles but if someone could
>give
>me a clue where it look I'd take a crack at making a patch it do this. >That
is
>assuming that someone who knows something about this thinks that it's a
>good
>idea.
>
>Anthony.
>
____________________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]