Re: gmc
- From: "Poletti, Don" <don poletti comverse-in com>
- To: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gmc
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 16:08:00 -0500
I find it very disturbing that gmc runs just to have
desktop icons. This seems like a terrible waste of
resources when most of the time I never use the icons.
I'm sure most users don't realize gmc is running since
it doesn't show up in the task list.
How much memory does gmc use?
>Remove the desktop icons
>and every time you quit GMC use the "Exit" menu option.
>No visible desktop
>No process still running in the background after quiting.
>Just like a normal filemanager.
>> Nope, not the issue here. gmc runs as the desktop, right? So a copy of
gmc
>> runs as a process every time you start GNOME (ps and you'll see, even
with
>> file manager closed). Anyone ever try to run gmc without GNOME running?
>> Still starts the desktop, right?
>>
>> This user wants to run gmc (or any file manager) standalone. No GNOME.
>> He's looking for a simple file manager with drag and drop capability
without
>> having to run as a desktop process. Can it be done?
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: gmc
- From: Federico Mena Quintero
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]