Re: gtkhtml
- From: mawarkus t-online de (Matthias Warkus)
- To: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gtkhtml
- Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 23:12:58 +0200
+++ Sun, Jul 02, 2000 at 04:52:45PM -0400 +++
Jacob Berkman e-mails me. Film at 11. Reply right now, after the break.
> mawarkus@t-online.de (Matthias Warkus) writes:
>
> > +++ Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 04:01:39PM -0400 +++
> > Steven Kordik e-mails me. Film at 11. Reply right now, after the break.
> > > Again, I re-iterate that I have no problem with GtkHTML as a
> > > widget/application/module whatever you want to call it... It fills a
> > > need, and it does a good job. Too bad it's NOT a Gtk Widget. It's a
> > > GNOME widget.
> >
> > The term "GNOME widget" as a technical term, used in the way you use
> > it, is nonsense. GNOME widgets are GTK widgets in the same way that
> > KDE widgets are Qt widgets and CDE widgets are Motif widgets.
>
> GNOME widgets aren't GTK widgets. You can't use gnome-config,
> gnome-preferences, gnome-stock, etc. etc. in gtk widgets.
Let's make sure I understand this:
CscHTML isn't a GTK widget because you can't use libart in GTK
widgets?
mawa
--
Strip.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]