Re: [SLE] Has The performance been forgotten?
- From: Bahram Alinezhad <alineziad yahoo com>
- To: suse-linux-e suse com, konq-e kde org, gnome-list gnome org
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [SLE] Has The performance been forgotten?
- Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 02:14:43 -0700 (PDT)
Thank you for your notice,
I want to add some comments:
1- My Linux setup and boot are on default settings (In
fact, I am not so foolish to add unused services to
the boot progress!)
2- In Windows OSs, I've installed a few programs and
updates, but I accept that its boot time becomes slow
and slower when you install more programs, though, the
worsts are those who add startup items.
3- In both Linuces, I've installed nVIDIA binary
driver (61.06) that works well, better than Windows
drivers; But this driver only affects 3d games, no
considerable difference in other programs.
4- When I speak about the applications, I mean the
time for invoke them, not the time for doing special
tasks inside.
5- I became tired in trying install Gnome 2.6 on both
SuSE 9.1 and RedHat 9.0; Generally, installed RPM
packages prevent the detection of newer versions
installed from source code; In addition, removing the
old rpm ruins the system... Gnome 2.8?! I see only 2.6
in the site!
6- My intention is not hiding the great advantages of
linux systems, such as: no need for restart, being
open-source and many more; I wish its desktop would be
faster.
7- The file system used here is ext3.
8- How much features do you think SuSE have that is
worth putting your hand under your chin for several
seconds after any click?
9- Is Mandrake Linux better in performance?
Bahram Alinezhad (alineziad yahoo com),
Tehran, Iran.
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]