Re: Why second panel is needed?
- From: Ka Hay <katinahaytova gmail com>
- To: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Why second panel is needed?
- Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:52:37 +0300
No no no no!!!
It is not true!
Please tell me that I am dreaming, or this is a badly composed 1st April
joke!
I LOVE gnome THIS way, All the gnome users - no matter if they are
computer geeks or not - that I know !!!all of them!!! like the second panel.
Please do not let the Windows Users to ruin EVERYTHING!!!
If they want WINDOWS they CAN use it.
They can re-arrange the menu and delete the second panel, etc.
If I do not like something just DO NOT buy it, but I do not DESTROY it!!!
On 03/31/2009 12:50 PM, Calum Benson wrote:
On 29 Mar 2009, at 18:17, Александр Бежашвили wrote:
*GNOME Panel doesn’t give possibility to find necessary application and
don't be misled in menu lists.*
*These 3 menu items grow up, but work with system is more and more harder
with them.*
*Users don’t have easy possibility get what they want, and what they
really
use.*
Button of fast access to often used applications and directories will be
more easy-to-use.
Common user rare add applets to second panel. And others do it only
because
they wanted that this panel would be wanted.
And what common user know difference Administration applications from
Preferences in System menu.
These would make good hypotheses for a usability study... but without
any data to prove them, they're really just opinions. And everyone has
a lot of those :)
Fortunately, the guys working on the new GNOME shell are throwing away
the current panel ideas, and re-thinking the whole desktop model from
the ground up. You might want to read:
<http://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell>
and join the discussion over at:
<http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list>
*Miguel de Icaza uses openSUSE with Windows-like menu.*
/me bites tongue :)
Cheeri,
Calum.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]