Re: [gnome-love] Tinderbox (automatic daily build) for GNOME
- From: "Olav Vitters" <ovitters gmail com>
- To: "Sergio Villar Senin" <svillar igalia com>
- Cc: gnome-love gnome org
- Subject: Re: [gnome-love] Tinderbox (automatic daily build) for GNOME
- Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 17:16:32 +0200
On 4/5/06, Sergio Villar Senin <svillar igalia com> wrote:
Olav Vitters wrote:
On 4/4/06, Sergio Villar Senin <svillar igalia com> wrote:
* integration with GNOME Bugzilla
Bugzilla in general could be difficult, but GNOME Bugzilla can be
done, providing the client somehow knows the Bugzilla product. Not all
modules built by jhbuild are on b.g.o, some might be on
bugs.freedesktop.org or elsewhere. It should also not spam the
developers, so it must be sure it is actually a bug before
automatically filing it. E.g. if it builds something for the first
time and it doesn't work, it probably is some configuration error.
The server should be responsible for filing the bugs, otherwise we
might have 100 bugs filed at the same time. Plus it should avoid
filing the same bug over and over again.
I think I didn't explain it enough. What I'm trying to say with
"integration with GNOME Bugzilla" is the usual integration between
tinderbox and bugzilla, that's it, the tinderbox inserts links to the
bugs solved by each checkin into the status pages. Currently this
integration works if both tools are located in the same machine.
Integration with remote Bonsai and Bugzilla are in Mike Taylor's todo
list, so maybe it will be available soon.
Hmm.. I assume then that currently it provides the status of the bug
in the title? Otherwise for a simple link it wouldn't matter where the
server was (meaning Bugzilla which is my only interest).
I do not suggest to automatically submit bugs, I think this is a human
task. IMHO I could be better do send a mail (we currently do it here in
our projects), don't you think so?
Haven't made my mind up. Mailing prevents bugspam, but with large
projects creating a bug might be handier for developers as there
always is the chance a triager will review it (and mark it
invalid/notabug when it doesn't make sense).
Regards,
Olav
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]