Re: GNOME Office and OpenOffice (fwd)
- From: Michael Hoennig "(mi)" <mi sun com>
- To: Sam TH <sam uchicago edu>
- Cc: Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik ireland sun com>, gnome-office-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME Office and OpenOffice (fwd)
- Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2000 09:05:25 GMT
Hi Sam,
I read the other answers to your following statement, but to me it
seemed, nobody brought it really clearly to the point. But before I go
on: I am not a lawyer.
> 3) Copyright assignment. Personally, I am unwilling to assign copyright
of
> my code to Sun. I think they have good intentions with regard to this
> project, and I respect them greatly for releasing this great body of
code,
> but I am not willing to trust that they will always be this enlightened.
Preferred would have been a copyright transfer to the "OpenOffice
Foundation" - but it is not founded yet.
The point in transferring the copyright to a legal person is that only a
legal person can fight copyright infringements. If 100+ separate people
had a copyright on their part, all would have to agree to fight a
copyright violation. You never get all these together. And it would not
even be possible to fight a company who tries to integrate parts of
OpenOffice into their own proprietary non-GPL, non-SISSL product! Only
the copyright transfer to a single, distinct legal person can avoid such
situations.
Michael
--
I am speaking for myself, not for my employer.
Please do NOT direct any questions about OpenOffice/StarOffice
to my email address, use appropriate mailing lists instead.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]