Re: [Gnome-print] Re: [Gimp-print-devel] An introduction to gnome-print (fwd)
- From: Robert L Krawitz <rlk alum mit edu>
- To: lauris kaplinski com
- CC: mike easysw com, miguel helixcode com, neumanns uni-duesseldorf de, gnome-print helixcode com, rlk tiac net
- Subject: Re: [Gnome-print] Re: [Gimp-print-devel] An introduction to gnome-print (fwd)
- Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 19:28:55 -0400
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 00:47:06 +0200 (CEST)
From: Lauris Kaplinski <lauris@kaplinski.com>
> What you really should do is discuss any perceived shortcomings of
> PostScript with Adobe.
Yes. But we should not try to convince Adobe improving PostScript,
but instead do that ourselves. It time to take standard away from
the hands of evil corporation :)
I've heard of using a sledgehammer to kill a fly; I've never heard of
using a flyswatter to kill an elephant.
I'm sorry, but this just about takes the cake for sheer nonsense.
Adobe may control the PostScript standard, but it is very well
specified, it's under active development, and Adobe's doing a good job
with it. Exactly how do you propose to "take the standard away" from
Adobe?
--
Robert Krawitz <rlk@alum.mit.edu> http://www.tiac.net/users/rlk/
Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2
Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail lpf@uunet.uu.net
Project lead for The Gimp Print -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net
"Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works."
--Eric Crampton
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]