Re: [Gnome-print] Re: [Gimp-print-devel] An introduction to gnome-print(fwd)
- From: Robert L Krawitz <rlk alum mit edu>
- To: federico helixcode com
- CC: miguel helixcode com, mike easysw com, lauris ariman ee, neumanns uni-duesseldorf de, gnome-print helixcode com, rlk tiac net
- Subject: Re: [Gnome-print] Re: [Gimp-print-devel] An introduction to gnome-print(fwd)
- Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 19:04:45 -0400
From: Federico Mena Quintero <federico@helixcode.com>
Date: 09 Jun 2000 13:24:13 -0500
An application, using the gnome-print drawing API, generates metafile
data that gets piped to a print server process. This can run on the
same box as the application or on a printer-controlling machine at the
other end of the office.
...
Now this proposal makes sense. I still think it would be better to
work with Adobe to improve Postscript, but that's a relatively minor
point. If Postscript isn't powerful enough for your needs, and you
really need a better file format, at least this proposal clearly
separates server from client functionality.
For all I care,
Precisely the point.
the print server process can be a CUPS-provided thing
or something equivalent.
It appears to me that your proposal is as follows:
Application prints to Caanvas
Caanvas layer generates metafile
Metafile is sent to print system
Print system feeds metafile through rasterizer
Rasterizer output gets fed through back end printer driver
Is that correct?
--
Robert Krawitz <rlk@alum.mit.edu> http://www.tiac.net/users/rlk/
Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2
Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail lpf@uunet.uu.net
Project lead for The Gimp Print -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net
"Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works."
--Eric Crampton
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]