Re: [Gnome-print] Re: GnomeFont state of affairs
- From: Lauris Kaplinski <lauris kaplinski com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- cc: gnome-devel-list gnome org, gnome-print helixcode com
- Subject: Re: [Gnome-print] Re: GnomeFont state of affairs
- Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 00:48:11 +0200 (CEST)
On 16 Jun 2000, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Lauris Kaplinski <lauris@kaplinski.com> writes:
> > Good point. I would like GFont also, because it saves typing :)
> > But g_ namespace is quite filled already, so I am reluctant to move
> > anything there before I am absolutely sure, it is done The Right Way and
> > can really be universal partner of other g_ projects. Just like Gtk object
> > system is moved to g_ only now, when it is already proven to be excellent.
> >
>
> Note that the glib namespace is g_, but GConf for example uses gconf_
> and you could use gfont_ or something.
It is nice with macros and methods, but evil with types:
font = (GFont *) gfont_new (GFONT_TRUETYPE);
font = (GFont *) g_font_new (G_FONT_TRUETYPE);
Of course, this is mostly no-issue :)
Lauris
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]