[Gnome-print] Re: ghostscript todo
- From: Joel Becker <jlbec evilplan org>
- To: Raph Levien <raph acm org>
- Cc: Mathieu Lacage <mathieu eazel com>, gnome-hackers gnome org, gnome-print helixcode com, rlk alum mit edu
- Subject: [Gnome-print] Re: ghostscript todo
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 22:43:30 +0100
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 05:33:15PM -0700, Raph Levien wrote:
> I think the jury is still out on whether Gimp Print or Omni will be the
> driver collection of choice. In either case, I'm pretty happy to defer
> to one of them instead of trying to maintain responsibility for drivers
> inside GS. As I mentioned, the drivers are of fairly low quality, and
> there's no modular architecture.
Do either of these drver collections come anywhere *near* the
portability of Ghostscript's current drivers? I am aware that some
(most) of the current drivers are mediocre, but I believe the
portability of Ghostscript is important to preserve. Omni is Java,
which -- aside from the language/freedom issues -- is only portable
insofar as you have a JDK on said platoform. I'm not at all familiar
with the range of gimp-print, though it probably at least ranges the
platforms that GIMP builds on.
Joel
--
Life's Little Instruction Book #497
"Go down swinging."
http://www.jlbec.org/
jlbec@evilplan.org
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]