[Gnome-print] First draft of new encoding routines
- From: Scott Gifford <sgifford tir com>
- To: gnome-print helixcode com
- Subject: [Gnome-print] First draft of new encoding routines
- Date: 14 Jun 2001 04:05:17 -0400
OK, I have a first draft of some new encoding routines:
http://www.tir.com/~sgifford/filter/
They are implemented in several files which can work apart from
gnome-print. To use them with gnome-print, you have to copy some
files into a copy of the gnome-print 1-4-branch tree and apply a
patch. Instructions are included in the tarfile, in
"gnome-print.notes". Fairly complete library documentation is also
included in "README".
I'd appreciate any comments on what's there so far, and what needs to
happen to make it a part of a gnome-print release. Here are the
things I already know are wrong with it; I don't know how to fix all
of them, so hints and advice would be appreciated.
Currently, the patch just makes gnome-print always use the new
routines; I didn't include a compile-time or run-time option. I can
do that in the next iteration, but I wanted to send out what I'd done
so far, so if I'm going in the wrong direction somebody can stop me
now. Besides, if I'm going to do it, I should do it right, and I
don't know enough about the configuration system to do it right.
Currently, it only works in gnome-print-ps.c, not gnome-print-ps2.c.
When I compiled gnome-print, it called the routines in
gnome-print-ps.c, so that's what I patched. If somebody can tell me
what to do to make gnome-print use gnome-print-ps2.c (and if I need to
do this), I can patch that too. I can try working it in other places,
too, if the design looks OK.
Currently, it always encodes in RLE+A85.
Probably with this patch it's impossible to produce PostScript
language-level 1 documents, although I should be able to fix that
without too much work if I find out how to tell what language level
I'm writing at.
I haven't tested in on a big-endian machine yet; I will later this
week. I don't think it contains any endian-dependant code.
Here's the other comments and notes from the 'gnome-print.notes':
Current Issues:
* Only images are encoded, and only when written to PostScript.
* Only a RunLengthEncode+ASCII85Encode filter is supported.
* Invalid PostScript LanguageLevel 1 documents are probably produced
(although it should be straightforward to fix).
Comments:
* I don't know enough about the configuration of gnome-print to know
how to infer what an appropriate set of drivers are. Things I'd
need to know are:
- Language level supported (1 can only use ASCIIHexEncode,
2 supports ASCII85Encode and
RunLengthEncode,
3 supports FlateEncode (not yet
implemented)
)
- Whether it can handle 8-bit input. GhostScript has no problem
with 8-bit input, so we're wasting 25% of space by
ASCII85Encoding binary data.
- Possibly more specific information about what filters are
supported.
* I've tried to write this library in a way that is easily
extensible, and that lends itself to external dymanic modules.
Hopefully those will be implemented someday, by me or by somebody
else.
* Currently, this library is halfway between a seperate library and
a part of gnome-print. I could be convinced to go either way ---
spinning it off into a seperate library that gnome-print can be
compiled with, or integrating it completely into gnome-print. The
reason it's somewhat seperate right now is because of the tests
included, which are quite nice (if I do say so myself), and I'm
not sure how to incorporate them into the gnome-print build
process.
Thanks!
----ScottG.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]