Re: Printer driver UI [proposal]
- From: Michael Goffioul <goffioul imec be>
- To: Robert L Krawitz <rlk alum mit edu>
- Cc: chema ximian com, kpfeifle danka de, kde-print kde org, till kamppeter gmx net, mike easysw com, foomatic-devel linuxprinting org, gimp-print-devel lists sourceforge net, gnome-print-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Printer driver UI [proposal]
- Date: Fri Mar 14 09:33:22 2003
> Then we'll have inconsistencies between the UI descriptions provided
> by printer vendors, as they seek to lock in users.
There's no point for vendors in using something major GUI's won't
understand.
> Anyway, until GNOME and KDE fully agree upon a standard look and feel
> (which I hope never entirely happens -- the competition and diversity
> are only good in the long run), there won't be any high level
> agreement on the details. So IMHO it would make more sense for the
> description to specify the semantics of the controls, rather than the
> UI layout.
The semantic already exists, at least in KDEPrint:
PickOne -> list box
Boolean -> radio buttons
Float/Int -> slider + spinbox
String -> edit field
Let's keep a simple tree view presentation of the settings and
forget about the whole proposal.
Michael.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Goffioul IMEC-DESICS-MIRA
e-mail: goffioul imec be (Mixed-Signal and RF Applications)
Tel: +32/16/28-8510 Kapeldreef, 75
Fax: +32/16/28-1515 3001 HEVERLEE, BELGIUM
------------------------------------------------------------------
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]