Re: [patch] Rework of Pango integration



On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 12:19, Jody Goldberg wrote:

> That is not the core of the problem.  Portions of the related
> layouts remain behind.  We're seeing things like :
> 
> MLK: 192 bytes leaked in 6 blocks
>   * This memory was allocated from:
> 	malloc         [rtlib.o pc=0x6a3c8]
> 	g_malloc       [gmem.c:136 pc=0xf9e56888]
> 	pango_ft2_font_render_glyph [pangoft2.c:314 pc=0xfb03afb8]
> 	pango_ft2_render [pangoft2.c:384 pc=0xfb03b45c]
> 	pango_ft2_render_layout_line [pangoft2.c:790 pc=0xfb03c3ac]
> 	pango_ft2_render_layout [pangoft2.c:884 pc=0xfb03ca98]
> 
> Even when the layout has been unrefed.  If it was just the global
> singleton this would be less significant.

This is just caching... it should be reachable from the fontmap,
right?

						Owen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]