On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 10:15 +0100, Petr Tomasek wrote: > On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 10:51:48PM +0200, Dov Grobgeld wrote: > > Hi Petr, > > Hello Dov! > > > I can confirm that such a layout certainly does not use neither > > OpenType tables nor my Hebrew accent heuristics. > > > > Regards, > > Dov > > So does it mean printing via gnome-print doesn't use the OT > hebrew pango module? Or is it possible, that the layout > got screwed somwhere beetween pango and gnome-print? > (Note, that on screen, even in the gnome-print preview > it renders OK). All the same modules should be used when rendering via gnome-print. I'm not sure I've tested with the Hebrew shaper, but I've definitely tested OpenType operation with the indic shaper and gnome-print. Could it be some bug with the handling of GPOS? I could easily imagine some bug creeping into the gnome-print/Pango integration dealing with the interpretation of offsets resulting from GPOS application. > Anyway, I filled a bug against gnome-print, is it ok > or should I fill aditional bug for pango? Basically, someone is just going to have to dive and debug to figure out where the problem is. I don't think there is any point in filing two bugs for one problem. Regards, Owen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part