Re: Evolution
- From: José Romildo Malaquias <romildo uber com br>
- To: enigma-list redhat com
- Cc: gnome-redhat-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Evolution
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 19:53:05 -0200
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 10:06:49AM -0500, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> José Romildo Malaquias <romildo uber com br> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 11:19:53PM -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2001-11-14 at 20:14, Christopher Keller wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2001-11-14 at 16:11, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > > > > I know evolution exists in rawhide but I keep getting dependency errors
> > > > > that I can't seem to solve.
> > > > >
> > > > > Does anyone have this built with whatever dependencies to go with it for
> > > > > 7.2?
> > > >
> > > > I've been using http://people.redhat.com/dsainty/evolution/RPMS since he
> > > > built them with no problems. It's sort of an old build of evolution,
> > > > but works fine.
> > > >
> > > > I did need to do an "rpm -ivh *.rpm --force" however. Doesn't seem to be
> > > > any ill effects, as he tagged the packages with a "ds" to differentiate
> > > > them.
> > >
> > > There are updated packages for Evolution RC1 in gnomehide
> > > (ftp://people.redhat.com/hp/gnomehide/) that should work nicely with a
> > > 7.2 system without too much trouble resolving dependencies. You'll
> > > definitely want the libgtkhml9 and libgal7 packages.
> >
> > I haved installed the following packages from gnomehide:
> >
> > libxml
> > libxml-devel
> > ORBit
> > ORBit-devel
> > bonobo
> > bonobo-devel
> > GConf
> > GConf-devel
> > oaf
> > oaf-devel
> > bonobo-conf
> > bonobo-conf-devel
> > libgal18
> > gal
> > gal-devel
> > gtkhtml
> > gtkhtml-devel
> > evolution
> >
> > to satisfy the dependencies among packages.
> >
> > But there seems to be small bug in this evolution package, as I have found
> > when running setup wizard. As I have been told in the evolution mailing list,
> > I needed to set the suid bit on camel-lock-helper or it wouldn't be able to
> > create a lock in /var/spool/mail:
>
> It shouldn't create a lock - it should lock the file.
I reported in the evolution mailing list:
When running evolution 0.99.0 [from the gnomehide] for the first time
in my Red Hat Linux 7.2 box, at the setup assistant, I receive the
following error message:
Error:
Could not get inbox for new mail store:
Could not lock '/var/spool/mail/romildo'
No shortcut will be created.
I was configuring with the Server Type "Standard Unix mbox spools" for
receiving email, and "Sendmail" for sending email.
And was told to do
# chown root.mail /usr/sbin/camel-lock-helper
# chmod g+s /usr/sbin/camel-lock-helper
which solved the problem.
So I phrased wrongly my sentence. The correct writing should be something like:
It could not lock /var/spool/mail/romildo and it could not create a
shortcut to /var/spool/mail/romildo.
But, as pointed out by Owen Taylor in a response, "some fixes are probably
necessary to how the evolution package is doing locking~, since
"Red Hat standardizes on fcntl() locking in /var/spool/mail, which
does _not_ require suid privileges to create locks."
Romildo
--
Prof. José Romildo Malaquias Departamento de Computação
http://iceb.ufop.br/~romildo Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto
romildo iceb ufop br Brasil
romildo uber com br
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]