Re: Galeon?

[seth vidal <skvidal phy duke edu>]

On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 00:33, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 10:54:52PM -0400, Alex wrote:
> > Is galeon no longer part of red hat, just because galeon is not an
> > official gnome package? Its bad enough that i have to piece meal my
> > multimedia stuff from other sites (which is understandable, due to
> > patent and copyright issues) but red hat is sending the message that
> > galeon is inferior to konqueror, mozilla, epiphany, lynx, and links.
> > 
> 
> Galeon 2 and Epiphany are nearly identical at the moment; including
> both doesn't make a lot of sense. Epiphany is developed by the main
> developer of the original Galeon 1.x, so it seems logical to move to
> Epiphany as the successor to Galeon 1.x.
> 

Something that might be useful, is to encourage the epiphany developers
to make sure that it can cleanly import galeon bookmarks and preferences
where possible.

I know I have a lot of users who would hate to have to move them all
manually.

-sv