El vie, 25-06-2010 a las 01:17 +0200, Giovanni Campagna escribió:
> Are you arguing that no problem exists at all with current Shell design?
> I think it is not the case. Design should be clear, without the user
> saying "yeah... I see you point... sometimes... still I don't pretty
> much like it..." after reading the archives or listening to the
> developer opinion.
The design is crystal clear on that point:
No optional components in the core. No moving around of core components.
No exceptions.
So instead of choosing between(*):
- an application-centric dock
- a windows-per-workspace list
- a global window list
placed:
- alongside the application menu
- in the message tray
- at the left/right screen edge
and enforcing it on all users(**), they are given a choice.
Ain't that evil?
Florian
(*) Only picking some of the sane suggestions, browse the archives
for the crack
(**) It's pretty funny how all those comments are along the lines of:
"But users want a task list, and they happen to want
the same kind of task list I want, now isn't that a
coincidence!"
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part