Il mer, 2003-06-25 alle 14:38, Bill Haneman ha scritto:
> I _really_ think we should use the globe icon (or at least another globe
> icon) which we are already using for "web browser".
What about something like attached Safari like? :-)
> Having
> application-specific icons as our defaults seems like a bad idea since
> it forces users to learn new icons, and forces icon designers to create
> new icons based on "differentness" rather than using an agreed-upon
> mnemonic (i.e. "world" means world-wide-web).
True, but I think we should start adding a gnome-web-browser.png icon in
g-i-t, then use it for GNOME default web browser.
> If we want something for
> mozilla that's different from Epiphany, we already have that (i.e. the
> mozilla lizard) - that works for people who know/care about the
> difference between various "branded" web browsers.
IMHO galeon is the trouble: it's a GNOME web browser, it's an epiphany
'branch', it's looks like ephy more then mozilla. So, should we use the
same gnome-web-browser.png icon too?
Besides mozilla is a 'web suite': following HIG we should have
Internet+
|
+-Mozilla+
|
+-Web Browser
|
|
+-Mail & News Client
|
+-HTML composer
|
+-Addressbook
> But I think our
> default configuration should use generic icons for "generic apps" (i.e.
> apps that users can choose via the Advanced->Preferred Applications
> dialog).
>
> - Bill
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-themes-list mailing list
> gnome-themes-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-themes-list
--
Think bigger
My uncle
Attachment:
web-browser.png
Description: PNG image
