Re: cdda:// URIs and the default handler



On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 08:42 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
> On 9/22/05, Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 19:36 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 09:38 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm not sure where we should ship the script (or perhaps a c-based
> > > > version of it) though. In gnome-vfs? If its in gnome-volume-manager then
> > > > people with g-v-m not installed will get the bizarre cdda:// error
> > > > message, which is pretty bad. If we want the script to have e.g. warning
> > > > dialogs then it needs to link to gtk+ though, which isn't very nice for
> > > > gnome-vfs. Maybe libgnomeui?
> > >
> > > I'd rather not scatter this particular piece any more - having two
> > > barely-matching pieces in gnome-vfs and g-v-m is bad enough.
> > >
> > > Do we care about people who run gnome-vfs but don't run g-v-m?
> >
> > Is g-v-m part of the desktop these days?
> 
> Yes, it is part of the desktop[1] since Gnome 2.7[2].
> 
> Cheers,
> Elijah
> 


It's only part of Linux distributions of GNOME though, as it depends on
HAL which is still Linux-only as far as I know.

-
Evandro



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]