Re: some gvfs code



On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 18:33 +0200, Christian Neumair wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 08.10.2006, 14:21 +0200 schrieb Alexander Larsson:
> > On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 12:40 +0200, Christian Neumair wrote:
> > > My personal preference would be to simply check for <sys/xattr.h>
> > > presence, and only look for libattr if that fails to support glibc 2.2.
> > > If either libattr is present, or <sys/xattr.h> is around, HAVE_XATTR
> > > would be used. As claimed in a followup of [1], the glibc syscalls are
> > > stubbed out for operating systems not supporting xattrs, and will return
> > > ENOSYS.
> > 
> > Sounds good to me. Wanna hack it up?
> 
> Proposed patch attached.

Commited.




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]