Re: GVfs status report
- From: "Dominic Lachowicz" <domlachowicz gmail com>
- To: "Alexander Larsson" <alexl redhat com>
- Cc: gnome-vfs <gnome-vfs-list gnome org>, gtk-devel-list <gtk-devel-list gnome org>, Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Subject: Re: GVfs status report
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:16:24 -0400
Hi Alex,
On 9/14/07, Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 14:12 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There's a lot of code to absorb here, a minor comment, I might expect
> > GUnixFileInputStream/GWindowsFileInputStream rather than
> > GLocalFileInputStream.
>
> Well, the same class is used on both unix and windows. Its the
> implementation of "native files", and I don't see any need to split it
> out really. What differences would there be between the two?
Well, we'd probably want at least a Win32 implementation in terms of
the native Windows file API. Windows limits the number of FILE*s or
fd_ts to 2048 per process. The only way to get around this limitation
is to use the native API.
Cheers,
Dom
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]