Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] Please all comment

[Damien Sandras <damien sandras it-optics com>]

You can do this with a gatekeeper...
The gatekeeper will fully control calls and reject them is the allowed
bandwidth is "over".

Le mer 10/12/2003 à 12:59, Rob Giltrap a écrit :
> Slightly off this topic but I would also like to see something to suit 
> systems admins rolling this out across and organisation.
> 
> Can the bandwidth settings be easily controlled by a sysadmin so that 
> bandwidth limitations can be put in place as policies. I know alot of 
> companies do not want to introduce video conferencing as their WAN 
> infrastructure would get overloaded.
> 
> Rob.
> 
> Damien Sandras wrote:
> 
> >Le mer 10/12/2003 à 12:31, Iason Antipariotis a écrit :
> >  
> >
> >>maybe if we had a message when a user choose 56k or ISDN as connection 
> >>type like "video reception/transmission will be disabled, if you want 
> >>video reception/transmission please choose DSL" . This is enough clear imho
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >That's a good idea... Simple and effective. I mailed Craig from OpenH323
> >to know what he proposes but I really think your idea is good...
> >
> >Could also be "Please choose Custom Settings".
> >
> >Another question, for everyone... Is it clear for you how the video
> >bandwidth arbitrator in the video codecs work? 
> >
> >Should we keep the minimum framerate and minimum video quality settings,
> >or should we have a slider like in many  software :
> >
> >***
> >Try to keep a video bandwidth of XXXX kB/s
> >SPEED [-----------------------------|---------] QUALITY
> >***
> > 
> >That way if the user chooses max quality, the current min. quality
> >setting would be set to 70% and teh current min. framerate would be set
> >to 2. That would permit to have the required bandwidth.
> >
> >Currently, I'm sure users choose :
> >- Keep 2 kbytes/s
> >- Keep a quality of minimum 100%
> >- Keep a framerate of minimum 10 FPS
> >
> >With such settings, you will never have 2 kbytes/s
> >
> >So perhaps those settings are too complex for average users and that
> >advanced users do not need them. What do you think? 
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnomemeeting-devel-list mailing list
> Gnomemeeting-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-devel-list
-- 
 _      Damien Sandras
(o-     
//\     It-Optics s.a.
v_/_    GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/
        FOSDEM 2004:  http://www.fosdem.org
        H.323 phone:  callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras seconix com