[GnomeMeeting-devel-list] Re:[GnomeMeeting-devel-list] Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list]Re:[GnomeMeeting-devel-list] Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list]possible PAT
- From: "julien puydt laposte net" <julien puydt laposte net>
- To: "gnomemeeting-devel-list" <gnomemeeting-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] Re:[GnomeMeeting-devel-list] Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list]Re:[GnomeMeeting-devel-list] Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list]possible PAT
- Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 08:39:05 +0200
Damien wrote, during his holidays:
> Unfortunately, it is not the code's fault, but due to the
video4linux
> API.
Please... don't call that imprecise mess of ioctl calls an api...
> > (one thing prevents me to do this: v4l2 is supposed to appear
> > some day near)
> Indeed, it is alreayd supported by some drivers.
I haven't looked into it. I hope it is a real, nice api...
> (yes, I still consider qce-ga as buggy and faulty).
Well, as I said, the v4l mess doesn't give enough
precisions... hence it isn't sure the driver is really
non-compliant. But it is certainly buggy: it breaks 95% of all
apps! And the author tagging those apps as "buggy" doesn't
change that fact...
You didn't really explain why you think it would be a bad idea
to have the single buffer case handle everything?
Snark
Accédez au courrier électronique de La Poste : www.laposte.net ;
3615 LAPOSTENET (0,34€/mn) ; tél : 08 92 68 13 50 (0,34€/mn)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]