Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] crash? crash!

[Pierre-Philippe Coupard <pcoupard easyconnect fr>]

Damien Sandras wrote:
> > If we want good debugging with few reports, reports must be very
> > informative.
>
> Exactly!
>
> I do not want to hear the word "crash" again without having more
> information.

I'm glad to report that I've tested the latest GM quite heavily and it works 
flawlessly. So my guess is (1) the call history bug is fixed and so it's history 
(pun intended), and (2) my segfault really must have been a fluke, or something 
due to a bad mix of libs or something.

Damien, I didn't mean to annoy you. I'm trying to be helpful, but I just wanted 
to document things properly first. I'll try to send you a backtrace next time, 
if it crashes again (although from what I see, this looks unlikely).

Regarding your release schedule, I reckon if you wish to take two or more weeks 
to release 1.0 just because you feel better doing so, I'm sure that's no skin 
off anybody's back, and peace of mind and quality of sleep are more important 
than anything else. Life is too short for death marches, especially in the free 
software world.

Thanks again for your great work!

--
Pierre-Philippe Coupard <pcoupard easyconnect fr>
Software Engineer
--
The main problem I have with cats is, they're not dogs.
		-- Kevin Cowherd