Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] CVS Compiling Problems

[Justace Clutter <prophecy corpranet net>]

bash-2.05b$ ptlib-config --ccflags --libs
-DP_USE_PRAGMA -fno-rtti -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections
-D_REENTRANT
-lpthread -lldap -lldap_r -llber -lssl -lcrypto -lexpat -lSDL -lresolv
-ldl

Justace

P.S.  What as the responsible flag here?

On Mon, 2004-02-16 at 03:13, Damien Sandras wrote:
> Hello Justace,
> 
> That means that there is a flag that you are using for compilation that
> GnomeMeeting is not using. Can you tell me the result for you of the
> command just here under?
> 
> Le 16/2/2004, "Justace Clutter" <prophecy corpranet net> a écrit:
> 
> >I got it fixed....
> >
> >I had to add `ptlib-config --ccflags --libs` to the right line in the
> >make file in the src directory of gnomemeeting.
> >
> >Justace
> >
> >On Sun, 2004-02-15 at 15:55, Justace Clutter wrote:
> >> So, doing a deeper look, I have done cpp on the gnomemeeting.cpp file
> >> and looked at the output.  I have done this from this error line in the
> >> linking for gnomemeeting:
> >>
> >>
> >> gnomemeeting.o(.gnu.linkonce.r._ZTI10PBaseArrayIP7PObjectE+0x8):/home/prophecy/src/CVSModules/gnomemeeting/src/gnomemeeting.h:53: undefined reference to `typeinfo for PAbstractArray'
> >>
> >> The pre-processed file is the following:
> >>
> >> # 1 "/usr/include/ptlib/array.h" 1 3 4
> >> # 118 "/usr/include/ptlib/array.h" 3 4
> >> #pragma interface
> >> # 145 "/usr/include/ptlib/array.h" 3 4
> >> class PAbstractArray : public PContainer
> >> {
> >>   public:
> >>     static const char * Class() { return "PAbstractArray"; }
> >>     virtual const char * GetClass(unsigned ancestor = 0) const { return
> >> ancestor > 0 ? PContainer::GetClass(ancestor-1) :
> >> PAbstractArray::Class(); }
> >>     virtual BOOL IsClass(const char * clsName) const { return
> >> strcmp(clsName, PAbstractArray::Class()) == 0; }
> >>     virtual BOOL IsDescendant(const char * clsName) const { return
> >> strcmp(clsName, PAbstractArray::Class()) == 0 ||
> >> PContainer::IsDescendant(clsName); }
> >>     virtual Comparison CompareObjectMemoryDirect(const PObject & obj)
> >> const { return (Comparison)memcmp(this, &obj, sizeof(PAbstractArray)); }
> >>   public:
> >>     PAbstractArray(const PAbstractArray & c) : PContainer(c) {
> >> CopyContents(c); }
> >>     PAbstractArray & operator=(const PAbstractArray & c) {
> >> AssignContents(c); return *this; }
> >>     virtual ~PAbstractArray() { Destruct(); } virtual BOOL MakeUnique()
> >> { if(PContainer::MakeUnique())return 1; CloneContents(this);return 0; }
> >>   protected:
> >>     PAbstractArray(int dummy, const PAbstractArray * c) :
> >> PContainer(dummy, c) { CloneContents(c); }
> >>     virtual void DestroyContents();
> >>     void CloneContents(const PAbstractArray * c);
> >>     void CopyContents(const PAbstractArray & c);
> >>     virtual void AssignContents(const PContainer & c) {
> >> PContainer::AssignContents(c); CopyContents((const PAbstractArray &)c);
> >> };
> >>
> >>   public:
> >> # 161 "/usr/include/ptlib/array.h" 3 4
> >>     PAbstractArray(
> >>       PINDEX elementSizeInBytes,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>       PINDEX initialSize = 0
> >>     );
> >> # 186 "/usr/include/ptlib/array.h" 3 4
> >>     PAbstractArray(
> >>       PINDEX elementSizeInBytes,
> >>
> >>
> >> As you can see the PAstracyArray is not fully defined when it is
> >> referenced in the InClass method.  So is this related or am I blowing
> >> smoke?
> >>
> >> Justace
> >>
> >> On Sun, 2004-02-15 at 14:53, Justace Clutter wrote:
> >> > This seems to be happening on lines with the following form:
> >> >
> >> >   PCLASSINFO(GDKVideoOutputDevice, PVideoOutputDevice);
> >> >
> >> > I am not sure if that would help ya or not.  Thanks for any information
> >> > on this.
> >> >
> >> > Justace
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, 2004-02-15 at 14:49, Justace Clutter wrote:
> >> > > Ok...
> >> > >
> >> > > 	Well, that did not fix the problem.  I did a make clean in each package
> >> > > and installed in the following order, pwlib, openh323, gnomemeeting.  I
> >> > > get the same error.  One thing to note is that the library installations
> >> > > for pwlib and openh323 are very interesting?
> >> > > For instance the openh323 is backwards:
> >> > >
> >> > >         libh323_linux_x86_r.so.1.13.2 -> libopenh323.so
> >> > >
> >> > > that should be the other way.
> >> > > Then the libpt is screewy also.
> >> > >
> >> > >         libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.6.3 -> libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.6.3
> >> > >
> >> > > Should it not be:
> >> > >
> >> > > 	lobpt.sp -> libpt_linux_x86_r.so.1.6.3
> >> > >
> >> > > What do you think?
> >> > >
> >> > > Justace
> >> > >
> >> > > ================ Final configuration ===================
> >> > >     Installing into prefix: /usr
> >> > >
> >> > >            OpenH323 Directory is  :  /usr
> >> > >               PWLIB Directory is  :  /usr
> >> > >
> >> > >                 Quicknet support  :
> >> > >           SDL Fullscreen support  :  enabled
> >> > >
> >> > >                          OS Type  :  linux-gnu
> >> > >                     Machine Type  :  i686
> >> > >
> >> > >  If all settings are OK, type make and make install
> >> > > ========================================================
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Sun, 2004-02-15 at 13:59, Justace Clutter wrote:
> >> > > > No,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > 	I was just trying to show that there were no stale files from the old
> >> > > > install, thats all.  I will remove openh323 and pwlib and recompile and
> >> > > > re-install them.  I do not think that it will fix the problem though  I
> >> > > > say this because I have not changed the configuration since I did the
> >> > > > install earlier, and I had removed all other versions before I did the
> >> > > > cvs install.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > 	But I shall try this again...  bb.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Justace
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Sun, 2004-02-15 at 13:55, Kilian Krause wrote:
> >> > > > > Hi Justace,
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > -(snip)-
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > you didn't expect me to compare every and each filestamp with mine, did
> >> > > > > you... but does the reinstall of cvslibs fix your problem?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > > Gnomemeeting-devel-list mailing list
> >> > > > Gnomemeeting-devel-list gnome org
> >> > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-devel-list
> >> > >
> >> > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > Gnomemeeting-devel-list mailing list
> >> > > Gnomemeeting-devel-list gnome org
> >> > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-devel-list
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Gnomemeeting-devel-list mailing list
> >> > Gnomemeeting-devel-list gnome org
> >> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-devel-list
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Gnomemeeting-devel-list mailing list
> >> Gnomemeeting-devel-list gnome org
> >> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-devel-list
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Gnomemeeting-devel-list mailing list
> >Gnomemeeting-devel-list gnome org
> >http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-devel-list
> _______________________________________________
> Gnomemeeting-devel-list mailing list
> Gnomemeeting-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-devel-list