Le mar, 11/05/2004 à 14:04 +0200, daniel huhardeaux a écrit : > >If you register both to the SIP registrar and the H.323 Gatekeeper, you > >should be able to call indifferently users using one or the other > >following the remote is registered too. > > > > > Ok. But remember that asterisk has an h323 bridge. So asterisk can call > gatekeeper, as well as you can tell gatekeeper to send call to asterisk. > In this case, it's tranparent for users. But it's perhaps not an GM > problem ;-) > Indeed but it doesn't solve the above problem. Well sort of, by having all H.323 users registering to a GK, all SIP users registering to a SIP registrar, Asterisk could bridge the calls and permit to H.323 users to call SIP users even if SIP is disabled on the H.323 side and vice-versa. > >I think we will have to make a choice between the two protocols for the > >major one, because configuring firewalls for SIP and H.323 will be a > >pain. > > > > > Perhaps a stupid question: but as far as I know, IAX has no firewall > problem. Could this not be a solution? > It could, but IAX is not used outside of Asterisk. It is not a standard yet. I also read it had some security flaws. But it is certainly a long-term solution. > Daniel > _______________________________________________ > Gnomemeeting-devel-list mailing list > Gnomemeeting-devel-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-devel-list
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=