Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] Re: [OpenH323]VIDEO ISSUE SOLVED:Reg Latest Openh323 compilation in Linux

[Guilhem Tardy <gravsten yahoo com>]

My 2 cents:

It was noted that 2 identical cameras need to be identified with different
strings. So, however one likes the "user friendly" camera names, it is broken.
Damian proposed appending [1], someone said #1, ... whatever.

Users of GUI apps such as GnomeMeeting probably don't want to know about
/dev/video0, I understand this. There are ways to hide such information, and I
am not talking rocket science here. Thus, it is no argument as to how the PwLib
should work underneath.

There are cases where one would like to just say /dev/video0, whatever camera
(maker/model) it is. Take an embedded box with one video input. Whichever way
camera naming is handled, this has to be a valid option.

If it works, why fix it?

Does it work?

Best regards,
Guilhem.


		
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free. Download now. 
http://messenger.yahoo.com