And would you go for the current "unanswered calls" way or for the "missed calls" way described a mail before? That's the devel ml, so people can express their opinion. A popup, with a scrolling window indicating "Fullname | URL | Time of call" could also be a good thing. My only worry is that it would duplicate the history, but that popup window would only be displayed in case of missed calls, not displayable from a menu. Does that sound ok? Should it display missed calls or unanswered calls? (see mail just before) missed = not answered in time + busy unanswered = not answered in time + busy + rejected with the call popup + DND Le jeudi 23 septembre 2004 à 23:07 +0200, daniel huhardeaux a écrit : > Damien Sandras a écrit : > > >[...] > >2) a popup indicating the unanswered/missed calls and possibly > >presenting a list of them (a bit like the history, sort of a duplicate > >perhaps => perhaps not useful) > > > > > My vote > -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras seconix com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=