Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] Automatic configuration with provider choice was (GM 2.0 Promotion/Marketing (was: Interest for GM 2.00))

[Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com>]

Le mercredi 14 décembre 2005 à 13:56 +0100, CJ van den Berg a écrit :
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 01:36:56PM +0100, Damien Sandras wrote:
> > Well, I do not see why I would spend time and nights, for free, to ease
> > the access to one or another provider if they don't give anything in
> > return. 
> 
> Ok, I can understand that. The point I was trying to make though is
> that it's *them* promoting GnomeMeeting, and not the other way around.
> 

Ah well, if I do nothing and they present GM on their homepage, they are
doing promotion, but that won't happen.
If I add easy access for their services in GM, and they do nothing, then
I do not consider they are promoting GnomeMeeting.

> 
> None of the URLs in the PC-To-Phone settings dialog work here. They all
> return a bad certificate (expired) and then 404.
> 

ah ah, then it is my fault, not theirs (except for the certificate).

> > > I find it quite odd considering that GnomeMeeting actively promotes
> > > itself as a truely free (as in freedom and beer) project.
> > > 
> > 
> > Diamondcard's support is historical. They were the first provider to
> > have accepted to work with H.323 and bandwidth-consuming codecs like
> > G.711 (and now GSM) so that it works in gnomemeeting, while all other
> > providers were only supporting proprietary codecs.
> > 
> > Things are a bit different with SIP.
> 
> Yes they are, thankfully, after many years of waiting.
> 
-- 
 _      Damien Sandras
(o-     
//\     GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/
v_/_    FOSDEM 2006 : http://www.fosdem.org
        SIP Phone   : sip:dsandras gnomemeeting net 
                      sip:600000 gnomemeeting net