Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] SIP, RTP ports and firewall

[Daniel Huhardeaux <devel tootai net>]

Damien Sandras a écrit :

> Le lundi 21 novembre 2005 à 23:08 +0100, Daniel Huhardeaux a écrit :
>  
>
> > Damien Sandras a écrit :
> >
> >    
> >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > >      
> > >
> > > > Call didn't pass. "Fin anormale de l'appel"
> > > >   
> > > >
> > > >        
> > > Right. See this :
> > > 2005/11/21 19:58:55.364   0:59.816          SIP Handler:8499268 RTP     
> > > STUN could not create socket pair!
> > >
> > > Are you 100% sure you have run the NAT druid test and that it reported
> > > something different than "symmetric NAT" ?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >      
> > Damien,
> >
> > as told at the begining of this discussion, if I go back with 
> > gconf-editor to the RTP ports 6170:7170 or 6170:6190 it's ok, just have 
> > then the problem of only one or two call able in a row.
> >    
>
> I know that, my question stays valid...
>  
I started gconf-editor and modify RTP ports to 6970:6990, then run GM, 
then the druid: "NAT avec restriction de port" (NAT with restriction 
port), called 612 fwd pulver com and call went smooth.

I closed GM, modify RTP ports to 16384:16388, run the druid: "NAT avec 
restriction de port" (NAT with restriction port), called 
612 fwd pulver com and call failed like reported above.

I have some difficulties to understand why changing the RTP ports should 
interfere with STUN. Remember that registration is always ok.
--
Daniel