On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 08:34:57PM +1100, Craig Southeren wrote: > The "cvs glitch" may be my fault. > > I checked in a fix for the IP interface problem, but it was not correct > and broke the code. > > So I removed the version from the CVS, and then checked in a good fix. > This means the broken file and the new file had the same revision number. Aha, that explains it. I was very surprised to see to different commits with the same revision number. > The CVS snapshot may have occured before I removed the broken file, so > this may explain the problem > > Please accept my apolgies for this mixup Thanks for explaining how it happened! :-) I was seriously starting to doubt the integrity of cvs. :-O -- CJ van den Berg mailto:cj vdbonline com xmpp:cj vdbonline com sip:8918316 sipgate de
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature