Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] NAT traversal / [RFC] secondary STUN server option

[Jan Schampera <jan schampera web de>]

On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 14:18:06 +0100
thomas schorpp <t schorpp gmx de> wrote:

> the app depends on STUN infrastructure.
> 
> so lets bring a "Secondary STUN Server" option in prefs.
I also though about this. But of course you have to clarify (for the
user) that "Blocked" is both, a real NAT condition OR a broken STUN
server (well, that's basically how STUN works, the client can't detect
it, of course).

But beside these small comments, I'd agree.

Damien?
Julien?
Kilian?

J.

-- 
I know life sometimes can get tough! and I know life sometimes can be a
drag! But people, we have been given a gift, we have been given a road
And that roads name is... rock and roll!
KISS in "God gave Rock'n'Roll to you"