Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] Again: STUN

[thomas schorpp <t schorpp gmx de>]

Jan Schampera wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> I want to raise discussion about a kind of secondary STUN server again,
> because this morning, our STUN was down again.
> 
> The behaviour of a STUN check detecting "blocked" and a STUN server not
> responding is identical, so the registration to various SIP services
> fail.
> 
> I consider a "secondary STUN server", which is used when the "primary"
> detected "blocked", to double-check the result as a user friendly
> feature.
> 
> Jan
> 

no. ask the HW/line sponsors for a redundant system and solve this by DNS 
if you *really* want it.

but theres no real need for it, since everyone wants the major feature of calling 
phone2pc. for first setup stun.ekiga.net is sufficent.
its not suggestable to centralize stun to the ekiga projects service, if we break 
a certain users count barrier we may even need load balancers and more expensive 
hardware and line this project has no budget for.

so best way would be using country local stun services like stun.sipgate.xxx.
theyre very redundant.

the config druid should contain a list for them to select ;)

y
tom