Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] GnomeMeeting behind NAT
- From: darren mail freebirdtech com
- To: gnomemeeting-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] GnomeMeeting behind NAT
- Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 07:23:42 -0700 (PDT)
: )
I installed opengk last night and was going to test tonight.
What are the advantages of running a gatekeeper? And, is it still a
prefered method for NAT?
Thanks,
Darren
On 11 Oct
2002, Damien Sandras wrote:
> Hi all;
>
>
> Several of you had problems with GnomeMeeting behind NAT. There were not
> many solutions : RSIP, Newnat patch (buggy), Gatekeeper as a proxy.
>
> GnomeMeeting 0.94 has been delayed of a few days because a new solution
> was found (thanks to Roger for the idea) : IP Translation.
> You can choose in the GUI to enable or not IP Translation to the IP of
> the NAT/PAT router, you can also specify the IP to translate to. Bug if
> you register to ils.seconix.com, the ILS service will be used to
> determine the IP to use.
>
> Thanks to that solution, port forwarding is enough to make GnomeMeeting
> work behind a NAT/PAT router. GnomeMeeting also supports now to change
> the used port ranges, it means that you can have several GnomeMeeting
> running at the same time behind a NAT/PAT router. The "listening port"
> for incoming connections, is registered to ILS, it means that whatever
> the port you are listening on, your callto URL doesn't change (for
> example, callto://ils.seconix.com/dsandras seconix com will always work
> when you are registered to ILS).
>
>
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]