Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] default gateway (no gk)]
- From: Martin Lang <m lang thiesen com>
- To: Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com>, gnomemeeting-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] default gateway (no gk)]
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 16:37:09 +0100
of course, thats right.
Damien Sandras wrote:
That's a bit misleading too, putting the IP of a gateway in the
Gatekeeper section when that gateway is not a gatekeeper is a bit
counter-intuitive I think.
I'll think to a solution for 0.98.
Le mar 25/02/2003 à 16:17, Martin Lang a écrit :
From: Martin Lang <m lang thiesen com>
To: Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com>
Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] default gateway (no gk)
Date: 25 Feb 2003 16:14:04 +0100
ok what i'm think... ;)
i think it is the best way you don't add a additional field for a other
non gk server adress,
but you check the given gk host in the background, if the given gk host
isn't
a gk than you try the same way that gm goes when you type in a number
with "@192.168.1.7".
so one field to functions: gk or id
and nobody notice something.
Damien Sandras wrote:
Le mar 25/02/2003 à 15:37, Martin Lang a écrit :
Hello all!
i have one question, i use gnomemeeting as telephonie software.
my pc telephone switchboard is a pc software "pbx4linux"
(http://isdn.jolly.de/) with h323 support.
so everytime i make a call to anywhere i must type
in (in gm) "callto://0979142 192 168 1 7" (192.168.1.7 is the telephone
switchboard host).
if there any chance that i dont must every time type in the "@192.168.1.7"?
so only the number: "callto://0979142"?
note the pbx4linux isn't a gk software.
thanks for help!
mfg
martin lang
This is an option I long hesitated to include or not. I could easily
include it, but I fear people make the confusion between gateway,
gatekeeper, proxy, and so on.
What do you think?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]