Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] RedHat 9.0
- From: Yvonne & Paul Keser <kesers keser com>
- To: gnomemeeting-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] RedHat 9.0
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 10:26:48 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I am running RedHat 9.0 and was running the rolled version of
gnomemeeting, 0.96 I believe. It ran fine. I was able to connect to a
Windoze netmeeting box & he could see me. He didn't have a camera.
I was also able to upgrade to 0.98.4 (after removing 0.96)
Dumping the traffic it looks like I would only need to open up my
firewall if I wanted to allow incoming calls is that correct? If I only
want to make outgoing calls I don't need to open any inbound ports do I?
~ Some protocols like IPSEC require inbound 500 (I think) for outbound
connections to work. Does h323/gnomemeeting require anything like this?
I did read the FAQ but it looks like that is for incoming calls.
I was running Mandrake 9.0 and migrated to RedHat 9.0
Thanks
- -PaulK
urza wrote:
| PUYDT Julien wrote:
| |
| |
| | Thank you for your insight.
| |
| | Snark on #gnomemeeting
| |
|
| Domenico has explained me problem: he previously installed gm on
| mandrake and now he wants to know if there are some problems with redhat
| nine. i cannot answer coz i'm using gm 0.98 on slackware 9 compiled on
| my own.
| greetings.
| *urza*
|
|
| --
| Everything should be built top-down, except the first time.
_______________________________________________
GnomeMeeting-list mailing list
GnomeMeeting-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD4DBQE/X17Y6rYGEIVzyjkRAteQAJYwGAdjC5S+3jPhhn5ef2iDXmDzAKCIbQUE
BbWyudZ0eJXJCXkvNLprfw==
=RbtB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]