Hello to all, I have thought a bit more to this and finally I think that only support one provider for registration is bad, even if they have a large community of users and additional services like conferences (not sure it is free though). We are a free software community, with a small gnomemeeting community, let's keep it that way. To summarize : - 1.2 will keep ILS - 2.00 will have SIP support and a new registration mechanism on seconix.com. If possible, that registration mechanism based on LDAP and a SIP registrar/proxy, will be able to register users to FreeWorldDialup. If it is not possible, users will still be free to drop seconix (like they can now) and register to FWD only. Any comments welcome. Le vendredi 27 août 2004 à 09:00 -0600, Simon Wood a écrit : > Hi all, > I would think that whatever future capabilities of Gnomemeeting are, you want to think carefully about droping major bits code - tying users to old (unsupported) versions on code is a bad idea. > > If you can add support for LDAP and SIP as extras then that's a good idea, although I would be suspect of forcing users to use a sole SIP provider is not. They might be free now, but could start charging later. > > If Gnomemeeting could become the 'gaim' of video conferencing then that would cool. ;-) > > Simon. > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras seconix com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=