Le mardi 07 décembre 2004 à 21:58 +0100, Bruno Hertz a écrit : > On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 21:29 +0100, Damien Sandras wrote: > > Hello, > > > > We have a new ALSA plugin in CVS that could solve your problem. > > I'll have a look at it, thanks. > > > However, that doesn't sound normal to have to fight with such recording > > options to get decent latency. > > Hmmm. You know, I searched the web for two days, read tons of stuff > about kernel/audio latency, fiddled with pci latency and quite some > other things but still kept wondering why I actually found so little > material related to my particular problem. So maybe it really isn't > normal, but frankly I have no idea what the reason might be. > A bit weird indeed, nobody reported such a problem ever. > Soundcard? Buy another one? Too many pci cards in my system causing > lag on the bus? I have a ISDN, TV, PVR and Soundcard, plus Ethernet > of course. But does that have an impact? All I know now is that the > buf size changes things, giving delays in the millisec range if > reduced to 1k or less. The buffers are still less in GM. It requests 640 octets buffers and is using the kind of hw_params you are telling. If you had the exact instruction that could be compared to the actual plugin code. > > And what I know too is that XP booted on the same machine performs > much better, i.e. with very small delays. That's why I ruled out > hardware and didn't shuffle cards in the first place ... > > > > _______________________________________________ > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list > GnomeMeeting-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras seconix com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=