Le jeu, 17/06/2004 à 22:14 +0930, Malcolm Caldwell a écrit : > On Thu, 2004-06-17 at 20:10, Damien Sandras wrote: > > Le jeu, 17/06/2004 à 20:36 +1000, Craig Southeren a écrit : > > > > > > > > The measure is in kbytes/s => 100 kB/s is the max. > > > > > > > > I also thought it was a pretty high bandwidth for the current codecs. > > > > > > Not for a video codec, if used with G.711. Given that G.711 takes 64kbps, > > > that leaves on 36kbps for video. > > > > > > > Nope, it leave 736 kbps for video. > > Using kBps instead of kbps is a bit strange. Bits per second is more > normal in this type of scenario. > > This is consistent across gm. The graphs etc. They have the added > problem of not even telling you what the units are. > > Really, I have a 128Kbps link at home, people have 64/256Kbps ADSL > lines. Bytes per second does not help at all for people trying to > manage their connections. > I agree with you, but you are a power user. I think most users do not know the difference between kbps and kBps. I also think it is most intuitive to use kBps because people are used to see their upload and download speeds in other software and it is *never* expressed in kpbs. You can see mozilla, gkrellm, wget, ftp, all using kBps. -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras seconix com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=