Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] 1.2 Roadmap - Name Change?
- From: Malcolm Caldwell <malcolm caldwell ntu edu au>
- To: GnomeMeeting mailing list <gnomemeeting-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] 1.2 Roadmap - Name Change?
- Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 10:23:05 +0930
On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 07:16, daniel huhardeaux wrote:
> Damien Sandras a écrit :
>
> >>>Yes, and more SIP than IAX I think...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>IAX has advantage to pass natively firewalls ...
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Yes but it is not a standard, and it is also said to have several
> >security flaws...
> >
> Perhaps you misunderstood what I wanted to say: if today SIP is included
> in GM, what I fully support, perhaps it could be also a good idea to
> include IAX. But I have absolutely no idea about work that this
> represent. On the other hand, I know that GM would be the first UA
> working with the 3 majors protocols of VoIP.
What Daniel says makes me think:
Perhaps any name change should be delayed until win32 and sip are a
reality. (Perhaps this is what Damien intended anyway...)
My 2c: Perhaps using opal in the name will give more credit towards the
project that does all the hard work in gm.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]