Re: UPDATE3 [GnomeMeeting-list] Gnomemeeting to Netmeeting, Now both way calling OK, just no video
- From: Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com>
- To: GnomeMeeting mailing list <gnomemeeting-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: UPDATE3 [GnomeMeeting-list] Gnomemeeting to Netmeeting, Now both way calling OK, just no video
- Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 14:30:31 +0200
Le samedi 25 juin 2005 à 12:50 +0200, Benedek Frank a écrit :
> On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 12:41:11 +0200
> Julien PUYDT <jpuydt free fr> wrote:
>
> > > Just there I cannot make a call from GM to NM. But when I make the
> > > call from NM to GM, call works, but still no vide. Again, DMZ is
> > > open. So we thought there was a strange problem, but now, having
> > > tried another NM box, that also has access to all required ports,
> > > and it still doesnt work, I mean the Video. So I thought, maybe it
> > > is the GM side, as with both NM's, video doesnt travel. The ports I
> > > have open in front of the GM are
> >
> > Some questions:
> > 1) are you sure all gnomemeeting and netmeeting are configured to
> > enable video? It's no use to search for network issues if in fact
> > they don't even try to use video!
> > 2) find a situation where *everything* works then see what breaks when
> >
> > you had something in-between. Hopefully the LAN situation is the
> > easiest to get going.
>
> Hi, Yes, I did this. When I am on the Lan, same lan both GM and NM,
> everything works. Calls back and forth, Video back and forth, etc. I
> dont touch anything, just take the GM off the NM's lan (go back to my
> city with it) and try to use it, calls still go back and forth, just
> video doesnt go at all. No changes made in the NM or GM. GM's ports are
> open on the router, and I showed in my earliest post, and NM's ports are
> open as well, but to clarify I will past here what is open on either
> side.
>
> On Gnomemeeting side:
>
> 1 NETMEETING 1720 1720 192.168.0.4
> 2 NETMEETING 1503 1503 192.168.0.4
> 3 H.245 for Netmeeting 30000 30010 192.168.0.4
> 4 Netmeeting Test 5000 5016 192.168.0.4
>
Is that a port forward? Does the NAT druid test tell "Cone NAT"?
> And Netmeeting side:
>
> 1. 1024-65534 UDP
> 2. 1024-1502 TCP
> 3. 1504-1730 TCP
> 4. 1732-65534 TCP
> 5. 1503-1503 TCP
> 6. 1731-1731 TCP
> (These ports were opened by the Belkin router, when I clicked on
> Netmeeting ports options, kind of builtin feature)
>
> Did I miss something? Shouldnt it just work?
>
Yes it should. I really think something is problematic on the NM side,
ie on the side you do not control.
> Thanks
>
> Ben
> >
> > Snark on #gnomemeeting
> > _______________________________________________
> > GnomeMeeting-list mailing list
> > GnomeMeeting-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> GnomeMeeting-list mailing list
> GnomeMeeting-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list
--
Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com>
- References:
- [GnomeMeeting-list] Gnomemeeting to Netmeeting, only one way and no video
- Re: UPDATE2 [GnomeMeeting-list] Gnomemeeting to Netmeeting, only one way and no video
- Re: UPDATE2 [GnomeMeeting-list] Gnomemeeting to Netmeeting, only one way and no video
- Re: UPDATE2 [GnomeMeeting-list] Gnomemeeting to Netmeeting, only one way and no video
- Re: UPDATE2 [GnomeMeeting-list] Gnomemeeting to Netmeeting, only one way and no video
- Re: UPDATE3 [GnomeMeeting-list] Gnomemeeting to Netmeeting, Now both way calling OK, just no video
- Re: UPDATE3 [GnomeMeeting-list] Gnomemeeting to Netmeeting, Now both way calling OK, just no video
- Re: UPDATE3 [GnomeMeeting-list] Gnomemeeting to Netmeeting, Now both way calling OK, just no video
- Re: UPDATE3 [GnomeMeeting-list] Gnomemeeting to Netmeeting, Now both way calling OK, just no video
- Re: UPDATE3 [GnomeMeeting-list] Gnomemeeting to Netmeeting, Now both way calling OK, just no video
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]