Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Registration Failed:Not Acceptable

[Allan <amau sympatico ca>]

On Thursday 22 June 2006 09:21, Damien Sandras wrote:
> Le mercredi 21 juin 2006 à 17:32 -0400, Allan a écrit :
> > On Wednesday 21 June 2006 13:41, Damien Sandras wrote:
> > > > > NOT ACCEPTABLE on ekiga.net = Behind NAT and not configured (no
> > > > > STUN). The druid probably activates STUN.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you.  That fixed it.  Upgrading seemed to have changed the NAT
> > > > traversal setting on my system.  The strange thing now is that STUN
> > > > works.  In earlier versions I had to use IP translation.
> > >
> > > I fixed something related to STUN where it was failing before (while
> > > doing calls, registering should have always worked).
> >
> > Registering did always work until I upgraded.  The process of upgrading
> > somehow changed my NAT Traversal setting to None from IP Translation. 
> > Once you identified the solution everything was back to normal.  Must 
> > remember to check settings after the next upgrade.
> >
> > I'm working from memory and at my age memory is not always reliable but I
> > recall that in previous versions setting NAT Traversal to STUN did not
> > work on my system.   The problem lies I believe in the nature of my
> > router/modem (with its built-in firewall) which the druid reports as
> > having a symmetric firewall.  I previously had to set NAT traversal to IP
> > forwarding to make Ekiga work.   Now the druid will accept STUN but
> > despite all that the druid still reports a symmetric not a cone firewall.
> >  This is NOT a problem as Ekiga does work, just an observation.
>
> Ah, so the druid reports "Symmetric NAT" and the druid accepts STUN to
> be set?
>
> If so, it is a new bug...

Just to make sure there is no confusion, I DO port forward and the druid 
continues to identify a symmetric firewall but the druid accepts STUN.

Allan